Llm Context.Py
cyberchitta/llm-context.pyApache-2.0⭐ 295🔧 5 tools
F5.2SpiderScore (registry)
⚠ Hard constraint applied: multiple critical issues forces F
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%
Llm Context.Py is not recommended — low score (5.23/10) with 5 critical issues.
Recommended Actions
- highRun In Container5 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
- highLimit PermissionsRestrict tool access to minimum required scope
Do Not
- ✗running in production without container isolation
- ✗exposing this tool to untrusted input
Risk Flags (2)
- criticalunsafe_deserialization×5Unsafe deserialization -- untrusted data may execute arbitrary code
- lowno_input_validation×5MCP tool handler accepts raw string input without validation
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.23/10 (grade F)
- negativew=0.85 critical security issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 3.0/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-13Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 3.0 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
3.0
Security (34%)
5.8
Metadata (28%)
7.6
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
2.8
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
7.6
Operational Boundaries
3.6
Security Analysis
5.8
Score
5
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
5
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
5 CRITICAL5 LOW
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
10.0
Maintenance (35%)
5.0
Popularity (25%)
7.5
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/cyberchitta/llm-context.py)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →