Mcp Telegram
overpod/mcp-telegram⭐ 0🔧 32 tools
C5.1SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
Mcp Telegram has risks — usable with isolation (5.14/10, 0 critical, 0 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- mediuminput_reflectionUser input reflected directly in tool output -- may enable prompt injection via reflection
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.14/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.1/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-21Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 2.1 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
2.1
Security (34%)
9.3
Metadata (28%)
2.0
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
3.5
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
3.0
Operational Boundaries
2.5
Category Ranking: Communication
#39 of 57 · Top 68%Overall#395.1 (avg 5.4)
Security#279.3 (avg 8.8)
Description#362.1 (avg 2.5)
Metadata2.0 (avg 5.1)
Why #39 in Communication?
Top 68% of 57 toolsSecurity#279.3avg 8.8
Description#362.1avg 2.5
Metadata2.0avg 5.1
How to reach #38? Need +0.1 overall to pass Email Mcp (5.2). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 3.1 below category average.
Top action: Add action verbs to 24 tool descriptions (e.g. 'Creates...', 'Deletes...') (+1.6)
Security Analysis
9.3
Score
0
Critical
0
High
1
Medium
0
Low
MEDIUM
src\index.ts:100
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
5.0
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
0.0
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/overpod/mcp-telegram)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →