Mcp Memory Keeper
mkreyman/mcp-memory-keeperMIT⭐ 108🔧 46 tools
D4.8SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
Mcp Memory Keeper has risks — usable with isolation (4.79/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Recommended Actions
- mediumReview Before ProductionModerate quality score — manual review recommended
Risk Flags (1)
- hights_path_traversalPotential path traversal -- user input used in file system operations
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 4.79/10 (grade D)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.1/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 2.1 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
2.1
Security (34%)
8.6
Metadata (28%)
7.0
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
3.2
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
3.5
Operational Boundaries
2.4
Security Analysis
8.6
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
1 HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
9.0
Maintenance (35%)
5.0
Popularity (25%)
6.4
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/mkreyman/mcp-memory-keeper)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →