Forge

ferodrigop/forgeโญ 0๐Ÿ”ง 25 tools

D4.8SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%

Forge has risks โ€” usable with isolation (4.83/10, 0 critical, 1 high).

Recommended Actions

  • medium
    Review Before Production
    Moderate quality score โ€” manual review recommended
Risk Flags (1)
  • high
    hardcoded_credential
    Hardcoded credential -- secret value embedded in source code
How This Was Decided
  • negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 4.83/10 (grade D)
  • negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.2/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-21Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 2.2 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
2.2
Security (34%)
8.9
Metadata (28%)
2.0

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
2.4
Permission Scope
0.4
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
4.1
Operational Boundaries
2.6

Category Ranking: Developer Tools

#2 of 2 ยท Top 100%
Overall#24.8 (avg 5.2)
Security#18.9 (avg 8.5)
Description#22.2 (avg 2.4)
Metadata#22.0 (avg 4.4)

Why #2 in Developer Tools?

Top 100% of 2 tools
Security#1
8.9avg 8.5
Description#2
2.2avg 2.4
Metadata#2
2.0avg 4.4

How to reach #1? Need +0.7 overall to pass Hop (5.6). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 2.4 below category average.

Top action: Add action verbs to 23 tool descriptions (e.g. 'Creates...', 'Deletes...') (+2.3)

Security Analysis

8.9
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

1 HIGH

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
5.0
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
0.0

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/ferodrigop__forge.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/ferodrigop/forge)