Eion

eiondb/eionAGPL-3.0โญ 148๐Ÿ”ง 8 tools

F1.9SpiderScore (registry)
โš  Hard constraint applied: critical vulnerability
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%

Eion is not recommended โ€” low score (1.89/10) with 1 critical issues.

Recommended Actions

  • high
    Run In Container
    1 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
  • high
    Limit Permissions
    Restrict tool access to minimum required scope

Do Not

  • โœ—running in production without container isolation
  • โœ—using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (3)
  • critical
    tool_description_poison
    Tool description contains hidden directives that may manipulate LLM behavior
  • high
    hardcoded_credentialร—4
    Hardcoded credential -- secret value embedded in source code
  • high
    token_leakageร—7
    Secret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
How This Was Decided
  • negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 1.89/10 (grade F)
  • negativew=0.81 critical security issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.511 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.8/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-21Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 1.8 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
1.8
Security (34%)
4.9
Metadata (28%)
5.9

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
3.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
2.7
Operational Boundaries
2.1

Security Analysis

4.9
Score
1
Critical
11
High
0
Medium
0
Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

11 HIGH1 CRITICAL

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
10.0
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
6.3

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/eiondb__eion.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/eiondb/eion)