dockerfile-hardening-audit
daniellummis/dockerfile-hardening-audit⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C5.9SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
dockerfile-hardening-audit is usable with minor concerns (5.93/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.93/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 5.9/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 5.9 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
5.9
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
3.4
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
6.0
Permission Scope
4.0
Side Effects
4.5
Capability Disclosure
8.0
Operational Boundaries
8.0
Category Ranking: File Systems
#22 of 61 · Top 36%Overall#225.9 (avg 5.5)
Security#338.0 (avg 7.6)
Description#235.9 (avg 5.2)
Metadata3.4 (avg 4.5)
Why #22 in File Systems?
Top 36% of 61 toolsSecurity#338.0avg 7.6
Description#235.9avg 5.2
Metadata3.4avg 4.5
How to reach #21? Need +0.0 overall to pass Ipfs Server (5.9). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 1.0 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.0
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
2.6
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/daniellummis/dockerfile-hardening-audit)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →