local-memory-search
dagangtj/local-memory-search⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C5.5SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
local-memory-search has risks — usable with isolation (5.47/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (2)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
- mediumlocal-memory-search×2[TS-W009] Function 'get_embedding' reads data (subprocess.run(), json.loads()) AND sends externally (urllib.Request(), u
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.47/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 4.92/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 4.9 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
4.9
Security (34%)
7.0
Metadata (28%)
4.3
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
5.5
Permission Scope
5.5
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
5.0
Operational Boundaries
7.0
Security Analysis
7.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
1
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
MEDIUM
C:\Users\owenw\.spiderrating\pipeline\repos\dagangtj\local-memory-search\_agent\skills\local-memory-search\SKILL.md
MEDIUM
C:\Users\owenw\.spiderrating\pipeline\repos\dagangtj\local-memory-search\_agent\skills\local-memory-search\SKILL.md
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.0
Maintenance (35%)
2.0
Popularity (25%)
3.4
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/dagangtj/local-memory-search)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →