plans-methodology
cramtek/plans-methodology⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C5.8SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
plans-methodology is usable with minor concerns (5.81/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.81/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 5.65/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 5.7 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
5.7
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
3.4
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
4.5
Permission Scope
6.0
Side Effects
4.0
Capability Disclosure
5.5
Operational Boundaries
9.0
Category Ranking: Finance & Fintech
#49 of 68 · Top 72%Overall#495.8 (avg 6.0)
Security#338.0 (avg 7.6)
Description#435.7 (avg 5.9)
Metadata3.4 (avg 4.2)
Why #49 in Finance & Fintech?
Top 72% of 68 toolsSecurity#338.0avg 7.6
Description#435.7avg 5.9
Metadata3.4avg 4.2
How to reach #48? Need +0.0 overall to pass Bitcoin Daily (5.8). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 0.8 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
6.5
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
3.1
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/cramtek/plans-methodology)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →