Mcp Server
contextstream/mcp-serverMIT⭐ 30🔧 8 tools
F1.8SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%
Mcp Server is not recommended — low score (1.75/10) with 0 critical issues.
Recommended Actions
- mediumLimit Permissions28 high-severity issues warrant caution
Do Not
- ✗using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (3)
- hights_path_traversal×18Potential path traversal -- user input used in file system operations
- hightoken_leakageSecret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
- hights_token_leakageSecret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 1.75/10 (grade F)
- negativew=0.528 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.4/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 1.4 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
1.4
Security (34%)
5.5
Metadata (28%)
7.6
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
0.5
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
3.3
Operational Boundaries
1.3
Security Analysis
5.5
Score
0
Critical
28
High
0
Medium
0
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
28 HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
9.0
Maintenance (35%)
8.0
Popularity (25%)
4.9
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/contextstream/mcp-server)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →