kimi-file-transfer
chongjie-ran/kimi-file-transfer⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C5.1SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
kimi-file-transfer has risks — usable with isolation (5.14/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.14/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 3.3/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 3.3 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
3.3
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
4.2
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
3.5
Permission Scope
1.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
4.5
Operational Boundaries
7.0
Category Ranking: File Systems
#49 of 61 · Top 80%Overall#495.1 (avg 5.5)
Security#278.0 (avg 7.6)
Description3.3 (avg 5.2)
Metadata#314.2 (avg 4.5)
Why #49 in File Systems?
Top 80% of 61 toolsSecurity#278.0avg 7.6
Description3.3avg 5.2
Metadata#314.2avg 4.5
How to reach #48? Need +0.0 overall to pass File Finder (5.2). Biggest opportunity: Description is 1.9 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.5
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
3.3
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/chongjie-ran/kimi-file-transfer)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →