Redbook Search Comment Mcp
chenningling/RedBook-Search-Comment-MCP⭐ 40🔧 4 tools
D4.4SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
Redbook Search Comment Mcp has risks — usable with isolation (4.41/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Recommended Actions
- mediumReview Before ProductionModerate quality score — manual review recommended
Risk Flags (1)
- hightoken_leakageSecret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 4.41/10 (grade D)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.0/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 1.0 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
1.0
Security (34%)
8.2
Metadata (28%)
4.5
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
0.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
2.5
Operational Boundaries
0.9
Security Analysis
8.2
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
4
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
1 HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.0
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
5.3
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/chenningling/RedBook-Search-Comment-MCP)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →