mikrotik-api

bluemeda/mikrotik-apiโญ 0๐Ÿ”ง 0 tools

C6.1SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%

mikrotik-api is usable with minor concerns (6.14/10, 0 critical, 1 high).

Risk Flags (2)
  • high
    sandbox.not_configured
    [TS-C009] No sandbox
  • medium
    mikrotik-apiร—2
    [TS-W009] Skill can read sensitive data (environment variables, credentials, secrets) AND send externally (export). Pote
How This Was Decided
  • positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.14/10 (grade C)
  • negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 6.75/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 6.8 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
6.8
Security (34%)
7.0
Metadata (28%)
4.3

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
6.5
Permission Scope
4.0
Side Effects
8.0
Capability Disclosure
7.5
Operational Boundaries
9.0

Category Ranking: APIs & Aggregators

#42 of 139 ยท Top 30%
Overall#426.1 (avg 5.9)
Security7.0 (avg 7.3)
Description#426.8 (avg 5.9)
Metadata4.3 (avg 4.1)

Why #42 in APIs & Aggregators?

Top 30% of 139 tools
Security
7.0avg 7.3
Description#42
6.8avg 5.9
Metadata
4.3avg 4.1

How to reach #41? Need +0.0 overall to pass Api Generator (6.2). Biggest opportunity: Security is 0.3 below category average.

Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)

Security Analysis

7.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
1
Medium
0
Low
HIGH

MEDIUM

C:\Users\owenw\.spiderrating\pipeline\repos\bluemeda\mikrotik-api\_agent\skills\mikrotik-api\SKILL.md

MEDIUM

C:\Users\owenw\.spiderrating\pipeline\repos\bluemeda\mikrotik-api\_agent\skills\mikrotik-api\SKILL.md

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
7.5
Maintenance (35%)
2.0
Popularity (25%)
2.2

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/bluemeda__mikrotik-api.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/bluemeda/mikrotik-api)