research-automation
biohackerrrrrr/research-automation⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C6.5SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
research-automation is usable with minor concerns (6.49/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.49/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 6.88/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 6.9 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
6.9
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
4.1
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
7.5
Permission Scope
6.5
Side Effects
5.5
Capability Disclosure
6.5
Operational Boundaries
9.0
Category Ranking: Search & Extraction
#27 of 237 · Top 11%Overall#276.5 (avg 5.7)
Security8.0 (avg 7.7)
Description#376.9 (avg 5.3)
Metadata4.1 (avg 4.8)
Why #27 in Search & Extraction?
Top 11% of 237 toolsSecurity8.0avg 7.7
Description#376.9avg 5.3
Metadata4.1avg 4.8
How to reach #26? Need +0.0 overall to pass Ddgs (6.5). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 0.6 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.5
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
3.1
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/biohackerrrrrr/research-automation)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →