cf-crawl
bill492/cf-crawl⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C5.9SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
cf-crawl is usable with minor concerns (5.88/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.88/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 5.75/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 5.8 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
5.8
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
3.5
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
4.5
Permission Scope
5.0
Side Effects
6.0
Capability Disclosure
6.0
Operational Boundaries
8.0
Category Ranking: Web
#33 of 73 · Top 45%Overall#335.9 (avg 5.8)
Security#248.0 (avg 7.4)
Description#355.8 (avg 5.7)
Metadata3.5 (avg 4.2)
Why #33 in Web?
Top 45% of 73 toolsSecurity#248.0avg 7.4
Description#355.8avg 5.7
Metadata3.5avg 4.2
How to reach #32? Need +0.0 overall to pass Mcp Playwright (5.9). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 0.7 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.5
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
1.9
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/bill492/cf-crawl)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →