Docsentinel
arthurpanhku/DocSentinel⭐ 0🔧 1 tools
D3.9SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
Docsentinel has risks — usable with isolation (3.88/10, 0 critical, 3 high).
Recommended Actions
- mediumLimit Permissions3 high-severity issues warrant caution
Risk Flags (2)
- highpath_traversal×3Potential path traversal -- user input may escape intended directory
- lowno_input_validation×2MCP tool handler accepts raw string input without validation
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 3.88/10 (grade D)
- negativew=0.53 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 3.5/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-17Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 3.5 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
3.5
Security (34%)
6.9
Metadata (28%)
2.0
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
4.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
8.0
Operational Boundaries
4.5
Security Analysis
6.9
Score
0
Critical
3
High
0
Medium
2
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
3 HIGH2 LOW
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
5.0
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
0.0
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/arthurpanhku/DocSentinel)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →