Mcp Pfsense

antonio-mello-ai/mcp-pfsenseโญ 0๐Ÿ”ง 14 tools

C5.5SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%

Mcp Pfsense is usable with minor concerns (5.53/10, 0 critical, 0 high).

Risk Flags (1)
  • low
    no_input_validationร—4
    MCP tool handler accepts raw string input without validation
How This Was Decided
  • positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.53/10 (grade C)
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.2/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-17Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 2.2 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
2.2
Security (34%)
8.6
Metadata (28%)
2.0

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
4.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
3.1
Operational Boundaries
2.7

Category Ranking: Cloud Platforms

#31 of 54 ยท Top 57%
Overall#315.5 (avg 5.6)
Security#308.6 (avg 8.7)
Description#292.2 (avg 3.0)
Metadata2.0 (avg 5.8)

Why #31 in Cloud Platforms?

Top 57% of 54 tools
Security#30
8.6avg 8.7
Description#29
2.2avg 3.0
Metadata
2.0avg 5.8

How to reach #30? Need +0.0 overall to pass Mcp Redis Cloud (5.5). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 3.8 below category average.

Top action: Add action verbs to 9 tool descriptions (e.g. 'Creates...', 'Deletes...') (+1.6)

Security Analysis

8.6
Score
0
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
4
Low
LOW

src\mcp_pfsense\server.py:48

LOW

src\mcp_pfsense\server.py:106

LOW

src\mcp_pfsense\server.py:134

LOW

src\mcp_pfsense\server.py:178

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
5.0
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
0.0

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/antonio-mello-ai__mcp-pfsense.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/antonio-mello-ai/mcp-pfsense)