durable-files-weekly-review-public

andyylin/durable-files-weekly-review-publicโญ 0๐Ÿ”ง 0 tools

C5.6SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%

durable-files-weekly-review-public is usable with minor concerns (5.58/10, 0 critical, 1 high).

Risk Flags (1)
  • high
    sandbox.not_configured
    [TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
  • positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.58/10 (grade C)
  • negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 4.97/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 5.0 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
5.0
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
3.5

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
5.0
Permission Scope
2.5
Side Effects
6.5
Capability Disclosure
5.0
Operational Boundaries
7.0

Category Ranking: File Systems

#34 of 61 ยท Top 56%
Overall#345.6 (avg 5.5)
Security#178.0 (avg 7.6)
Description#375.0 (avg 5.2)
Metadata3.5 (avg 4.5)

Why #34 in File Systems?

Top 56% of 61 tools
Security#17
8.0avg 7.6
Description#37
5.0avg 5.2
Metadata
3.5avg 4.5

How to reach #33? Need +0.0 overall to pass Filesystem (5.6). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 1.0 below category average.

Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)

Security Analysis

8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
6.5
Maintenance (35%)
0.5
Popularity (25%)
2.8

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/andyylin__durable-files-weekly-review-public.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/andyylin/durable-files-weekly-review-public)