neon-postgres
andrelandgraf/neon-postgres⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C6.3SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
neon-postgres is usable with minor concerns (6.35/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.35/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 6.78/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 6.8 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
6.8
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
3.8
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
6.0
Permission Scope
6.5
Side Effects
8.0
Capability Disclosure
5.0
Operational Boundaries
9.0
Category Ranking: Databases
#21 of 160 · Top 13%Overall#216.3 (avg 4.3)
Security8.0 (avg 7.7)
Description#106.8 (avg 3.9)
Metadata3.8 (avg 6.1)
Why #21 in Databases?
Top 13% of 160 toolsSecurity8.0avg 7.7
Description#106.8avg 3.9
Metadata3.8avg 6.1
How to reach #20? Need +0.0 overall to pass Mcp Libsql (6.4). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 2.3 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.5
Maintenance (35%)
0.0
Popularity (25%)
3.0
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/andrelandgraf/neon-postgres)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →