meta-research
amberljc/meta-research⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C6.7SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
meta-research is usable with minor concerns (6.66/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (1)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.66/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 7.08/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 7.1 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
7.1
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
4.5
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
6.0
Permission Scope
6.5
Side Effects
5.5
Capability Disclosure
9.0
Operational Boundaries
9.0
Category Ranking: Search & Extraction
#13 of 237 · Top 5%Overall#136.7 (avg 5.7)
Security8.0 (avg 7.7)
Description#277.1 (avg 5.3)
Metadata4.5 (avg 4.8)
Why #13 in Search & Extraction?
Top 5% of 237 toolsSecurity8.0avg 7.7
Description#277.1avg 5.3
Metadata4.5avg 4.8
How to reach #12? Need +0.0 overall to pass Google Sheet Api (6.7). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 0.3 below category average.
Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)
Security Analysis
8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
6.5
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
6.0
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/amberljc/meta-research)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →