pdfs

alvisdunlop/pdfsโญ 0๐Ÿ”ง 0 tools

C5.7SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%

pdfs is usable with minor concerns (5.7/10, 0 critical, 1 high).

Risk Flags (2)
  • high
    sandbox.not_configured
    [TS-C009] No sandbox
  • medium
    pdfs
    [TS-W009] Skill can read sensitive data (API key, scrape) AND send externally (email send). Potential data exfiltration
How This Was Decided
  • positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 5.7/10 (grade C)
  • negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 5.67/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 5.7 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
5.7
Security (34%)
7.0
Metadata (28%)
4.2

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
4.5
Permission Scope
2.5
Side Effects
8.0
Capability Disclosure
6.0
Operational Boundaries
9.0

Category Ranking: File Systems

#30 of 61 ยท Top 49%
Overall#305.7 (avg 5.5)
Security#417.0 (avg 7.6)
Description#275.7 (avg 5.2)
Metadata#324.2 (avg 4.5)

Why #30 in File Systems?

Top 49% of 61 tools
Security#41
7.0avg 7.6
Description#27
5.7avg 5.2
Metadata#32
4.2avg 4.5

How to reach #29? Need +0.0 overall to pass Fast Filesystem Mcp (5.8). Biggest opportunity: Security is 0.6 below category average.

Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)

Security Analysis

7.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
1
Medium
0
Low
HIGH

MEDIUM

C:\Users\owenw\.spiderrating\pipeline\repos\alvisdunlop\pdfs\_agent\skills\pdfs\SKILL.md

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
7.5
Maintenance (35%)
1.5
Popularity (25%)
2.5

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/alvisdunlop__pdfs.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/alvisdunlop/pdfs)