clawswarm-consensus

alanarchy/clawswarm-consensusโญ 0๐Ÿ”ง 0 tools

C6.0SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%

clawswarm-consensus is usable with minor concerns (6.03/10, 0 critical, 1 high).

Risk Flags (1)
  • high
    sandbox.not_configured
    [TS-C009] No sandbox
How This Was Decided
  • positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.03/10 (grade C)
  • negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 6.25/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 6.3 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
6.3
Security (34%)
8.0
Metadata (28%)
3.4

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
4.5
Permission Scope
5.0
Side Effects
5.5
Capability Disclosure
9.0
Operational Boundaries
8.0

Category Ranking: Cloud Platforms

#22 of 49 ยท Top 45%
Overall#226.0 (avg 5.8)
Security#78.0 (avg 7.6)
Description#156.3 (avg 5.5)
Metadata#373.4 (avg 4.3)

Why #22 in Cloud Platforms?

Top 45% of 49 tools
Security#7
8.0avg 7.6
Description#15
6.3avg 5.5
Metadata#37
3.4avg 4.3

How to reach #21? Need +0.0 overall to pass Aws Cloud Watch (6.0). Biggest opportunity: Metadata is 0.9 below category average.

Top action: Register MCP tools with name, description, and input schema (+2.3)

Security Analysis

8.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
0
Medium
0
Low
HIGH

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
6.5
Maintenance (35%)
0.5
Popularity (25%)
2.3

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/alanarchy__clawswarm-consensus.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/alanarchy/clawswarm-consensus)