Grok Faf Mcp

Wolfe-Jam/grok-faf-mcpMITโญ 16๐Ÿ”ง 66 tools

F1.8SpiderScore (registry)
โš  Hard constraint applied: critical vulnerability
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%

Grok Faf Mcp is not recommended โ€” low score (1.82/10) with 2 critical issues.

Recommended Actions

  • high
    Run In Container
    2 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
  • high
    Limit Permissions
    Restrict tool access to minimum required scope

Do Not

  • โœ—running in production without container isolation
  • โœ—using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (3)
  • critical
    child_process_injectionร—2
    Command injection รขโ‚ฌโ€ execSync() with non-literal command
  • high
    ts_path_traversalร—13
    Potential path traversal -- user input used in file system operations
  • medium
    ts_input_reflectionร—3
    User input reflected directly in tool output -- may enable prompt injection via reflection
How This Was Decided
  • negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 1.82/10 (grade F)
  • negativew=0.82 critical security issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.513 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.6/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-21Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 1.6 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
1.6
Security (34%)
5.0
Metadata (28%)
6.9

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
1.1
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
3.6
Operational Boundaries
1.6

Security Analysis

5.0
Score
2
Critical
13
High
3
Medium
0
Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

2 CRITICAL3 MEDIUM13 HIGH

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
8.0
Maintenance (35%)
8.0
Popularity (25%)
3.6

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/Wolfe-Jam__grok-faf-mcp.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/Wolfe-Jam/grok-faf-mcp)