multi-viewpoint-debates
LatentFreedom/multi-viewpoint-debates⭐ 0🔧 0 tools
C6.3SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Consider
Confidence
90%
multi-viewpoint-debates is usable with minor concerns (6.32/10, 0 critical, 1 high).
Risk Flags (2)
- highsandbox.not_configured[TS-C009] No sandbox
- mediummulti-viewpoint-debates[TS-W003] Instructions to download and run external binary
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.32/10 (grade C)
- negativew=0.51 high-severity issue(s) detected
- positivew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 6.47/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-13Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 6.5 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
6.5
Security (34%)
7.0
Metadata (28%)
4.8
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
4.5
Permission Scope
6.5
Side Effects
8.0
Capability Disclosure
5.0
Operational Boundaries
9.0
Security Analysis
7.0
Score
0
Critical
1
High
1
Medium
0
Low
HIGH
MEDIUM
C:\Users\owenw\.spiderrating\pipeline\repos\LatentFreedom\multi-viewpoint-debates\_agent\skills\multi-viewpoint-debates\SKILL.md
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
6.5
Maintenance (35%)
2.5
Popularity (25%)
5.3
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/LatentFreedom/multi-viewpoint-debates)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →