Locallama Mcp
Heratiki/locallama-mcp⭐ 41🔧 12 tools
F1.8SpiderScore (registry)
⚠ Hard constraint applied: critical vulnerability
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%
Locallama Mcp is not recommended — low score (1.82/10) with 15 critical issues.
Recommended Actions
- highRun In Container15 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
- highLimit PermissionsRestrict tool access to minimum required scope
Do Not
- ✗running in production without container isolation
- ✗exposing this tool to untrusted input
- ✗using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (1)
- criticalchild_process_injection×15Command injection — execSync() with template literal interpolation
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 1.82/10 (grade F)
- negativew=0.815 critical security issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.6/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-21Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 1.6 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
1.6
Security (34%)
5.7
Metadata (28%)
4.5
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
2.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
2.7
Operational Boundaries
1.9
Security Analysis
5.7
Score
15
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
0
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
15 CRITICAL
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.0
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
5.3
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/Heratiki/locallama-mcp)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →