Hmem

Bumblebiber/hmemMITโญ 9๐Ÿ”ง 23 tools

F1.9SpiderScore (registry)
โš  Hard constraint applied: critical vulnerability
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%

Hmem is not recommended โ€” low score (1.85/10) with 5 critical issues.

Recommended Actions

  • high
    Run In Container
    5 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
  • high
    Limit Permissions
    Restrict tool access to minimum required scope

Do Not

  • โœ—running in production without container isolation
  • โœ—exposing this tool to untrusted input
  • โœ—using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (2)
  • critical
    metadata_secret_leakร—5
    Hardcoded secret or API key found in source code
  • high
    ts_path_traversalร—3
    Potential path traversal -- user input used in file system operations
How This Was Decided
  • negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 1.85/10 (grade F)
  • negativew=0.85 critical security issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.53 high-severity issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.7/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-21Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 1.7 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
1.7
Security (34%)
6.0
Metadata (28%)
4.9

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
2.1
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
2.9
Operational Boundaries
2.0

Security Analysis

6.0
Score
5
Critical
3
High
0
Medium
0
Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

5 CRITICAL3 HIGH

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
7.0
Maintenance (35%)
4.0
Popularity (25%)
2.9

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/Bumblebiber__hmem.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/Bumblebiber/hmem)